![]() The non-European areas became more important in the Cold War and by the 1960s many peripheral areas of the less developed world had assumed central significance. In reality the Cold War originated because of global, not European, problems. In addition, the fact that such a war allegedly developed into one in which non-European areas became more important reflected the questionable idea of a spread from Europe to the periphery. Of nuclear weapons and military strength. These were central to this war that involved everything but international armed conflict, and have defined the debate on whether the Cold War was more a war of ideas and soft power rather than a war dominated by the importance ![]() The idea of the Cold War as a realist extension of inter-state relations ( 2 ) and therefore concerned with hard power, Soviet-American diplomacy and foreign policy, underestimates the importance of ideology and the role ofĬovert operations and propaganda. The precise nature of the Cold War – a war fought by all means short of international armed conflict ( 1 ) – was soon defined by policy makers, and had an important bearing on its subsequent interpretation. ![]() The origins of the Cold War are often placed in Europe by orthodox historians and so ignore its global origins as well as the issue of whether the Cold War's development was driven by European events. Cold War and the periphery John Kent, London School of Economics ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |